Tuesday 24 August 2010
LinkedIn; thing 17
This is another thing I'm going to skip. According to my wife, most of the practical uses of this come after you've paid up, so I'm not going to waste my time on this.
Facebook; thing 16
Oh dear, no way of avoiding it I suppose (especially since there's a least one other 'Thing' I'm not going to do). So, I've signed up to Fa*e*oo* under a pseudonym a while ago, solely to see that was being said on a group about the UL. The signing up process was pretty grim, actually. Their process objected to the first name 'I.', saying "The name contains too many periods". It also objected to 'I' ("You must provide your full name"), "IM" ("The name contains too many capital letters") and even "Im" responding with a message which I think means it only likes Anglo-Saxon first names. And, you have to have a first name, so if you're someone like U Thant you've got problems. 'U' is a Burmese honorific, so U Thant's whole name is 'Thant' (or so I've been told).
So no marks to Fa*e*oo* for cultural sensitivity - but why should this be a surprise?
Anyway, I can tick the box, but I'm probably too old to appreciate this. Why for example does every entry on the wall have an icon of the Fa*e*oo* page that added the entry? It looks really quite odd.
Though the screen shot above probably won't do it justice.
PS The 23 things instructions include this:
gender and date of birth but (and I haven't told you this) it doesn't have to be truthful.
Why be so coy? I'm not telling anyone my real date of birth and interestingly Fa*e*oo* have decided to ignore the date of birth I gave them and substitute the date I joined.
So no marks to Fa*e*oo* for cultural sensitivity - but why should this be a surprise?
Anyway, I can tick the box, but I'm probably too old to appreciate this. Why for example does every entry on the wall have an icon of the Fa*e*oo* page that added the entry? It looks really quite odd.
Though the screen shot above probably won't do it justice.
PS The 23 things instructions include this:
gender and date of birth but (and I haven't told you this) it doesn't have to be truthful.
Why be so coy? I'm not telling anyone my real date of birth and interestingly Fa*e*oo* have decided to ignore the date of birth I gave them and substitute the date I joined.
Monday 23 August 2010
LibraryThing; things 14 & 15
I had to think about a use for this, given that I'm not keen on shelling out actual money, so I decided to create a small catalogue of items in the UL I'm interested in.
What do I think? So far, so good. I've added two items, and one of these is a rather obscure history of the 144th Regiment, Royal Armoured Corps, later the 4th Royal Tank Regiment. It will be interesting to see if I can export this list in some useful format. A quick look at the help pages and indeed it does offer an export function, and into CSV. This means it could go into Excel and from there into Access if I so desired. I could even create a catalogue of my books at home by importing 200 items, exporting them to CSV, deleting them and then importing another 200, and so on.
I've sorted the collections part, though this instruction:
To move books into the collection, click on the folder icon and select the relevant collection.
seemed a little abstruse. Perhaps "click on the folder icon on the right" might have been a little clearer. All that being said, it's rather nice. Pity about the 200 book limit (but that'll be the Scot in me coming out). One thing I didn't like was the widget, which has looks rather ugly in my blog. I've moved it a little, but the colours are still a bit odd. No doubt there are ways of altering these, but I shouldn't have to have an in-depth knowledge of html to change this.
What do I think? So far, so good. I've added two items, and one of these is a rather obscure history of the 144th Regiment, Royal Armoured Corps, later the 4th Royal Tank Regiment. It will be interesting to see if I can export this list in some useful format. A quick look at the help pages and indeed it does offer an export function, and into CSV. This means it could go into Excel and from there into Access if I so desired. I could even create a catalogue of my books at home by importing 200 items, exporting them to CSV, deleting them and then importing another 200, and so on.
I've sorted the collections part, though this instruction:
To move books into the collection, click on the folder icon and select the relevant collection.
seemed a little abstruse. Perhaps "click on the folder icon on the right" might have been a little clearer. All that being said, it's rather nice. Pity about the 200 book limit (but that'll be the Scot in me coming out). One thing I didn't like was the widget, which has looks rather ugly in my blog. I've moved it a little, but the colours are still a bit odd. No doubt there are ways of altering these, but I shouldn't have to have an in-depth knowledge of html to change this.
Thursday 19 August 2010
Reflections; thing 13
"God almechty, it's Reflections"
which should confuse anyone who hasn't heard of Scotland the What, and probably quite a few who have.
This is what I'm supposed to be reflecting on:
1. And so what?
See below.
2. How have your skills/knowledge improved?
A little
3. Have the 'Things' covered everything that you need to know, or think it relevant to know?
Probably not, but it would be unreasonable to expect them to do so.
4. Have the activities suited your learning style? (If you're not sure what your learning style is you can complete a very short VARK questionnaire which gives an indication of your learning style. There are lots of other similar questionnaires on the internet)
Not really. See below.
5. Do you feel more competent and confident?
Slightly.
6. How can you apply this learning?
7. What would you do differently - and what might change about how you approach the next 12 Things?
6 & 7. Not sure about that.
8. Is there one (or more) Thing that you would be happy to recommend to a colleague? Why?
Google calendars, but then I was using it anyway.
More detailed responses:
4/ I think the 'things' perhaps ought to have had more detailed instructions available. They occasionally read like someone who had already done this loads of times was jotting down some notes as an aide memoire. The screenshots really ought to have been of plain browsers with no themes, styles, etc. Many people may be starting this from scratch and to see Firefox decorated with planets or something equally distracting isn't necessarily helpful.
1/ The good, the bad and the ugly, or more accurately, the very good, the OK and the 'please uninvent this now'.
Very good: Google calendars; Doodle; Flickr/images.
OK: Tagging
No thanks; Twitter, and I might be tempted to include Delicious as well in this category.
which should confuse anyone who hasn't heard of Scotland the What, and probably quite a few who have.
This is what I'm supposed to be reflecting on:
1. And so what?
See below.
2. How have your skills/knowledge improved?
A little
3. Have the 'Things' covered everything that you need to know, or think it relevant to know?
Probably not, but it would be unreasonable to expect them to do so.
4. Have the activities suited your learning style? (If you're not sure what your learning style is you can complete a very short VARK questionnaire which gives an indication of your learning style. There are lots of other similar questionnaires on the internet)
Not really. See below.
5. Do you feel more competent and confident?
Slightly.
6. How can you apply this learning?
7. What would you do differently - and what might change about how you approach the next 12 Things?
6 & 7. Not sure about that.
8. Is there one (or more) Thing that you would be happy to recommend to a colleague? Why?
Google calendars, but then I was using it anyway.
More detailed responses:
4/ I think the 'things' perhaps ought to have had more detailed instructions available. They occasionally read like someone who had already done this loads of times was jotting down some notes as an aide memoire. The screenshots really ought to have been of plain browsers with no themes, styles, etc. Many people may be starting this from scratch and to see Firefox decorated with planets or something equally distracting isn't necessarily helpful.
1/ The good, the bad and the ugly, or more accurately, the very good, the OK and the 'please uninvent this now'.
Very good: Google calendars; Doodle; Flickr/images.
OK: Tagging
No thanks; Twitter, and I might be tempted to include Delicious as well in this category.
Wednesday 18 August 2010
Delicious; thing 12
After some mucking about with Delicious, I've come to the conclusion that there's one major advantage to it from a personal point of view. This is being able to find out who else has bookmarked a particular URL and to see what other bookmarks they've got - this way you may be able to find out useful URLs you've missed.
From the perspective of a library, it could be useful, but I think I might want them to appear as though they were part of my web pages, not something completely separate. I wasn't sure about the navigation aspect either - it struck me that Firefox could do some of what Delicious can do, and I don't think it would be impossible to write the bookmarking aspect of a browser to provide a list sorted by tags.
Finally I was a bit puzzled with this comment:
If you were working on two separate PCs which didn't have roaming profiles, you could of course export your URLs and import them at the other PC - this isn't difficult with Firefox, but is a bit of a pain. Alternatively you could run the browser from a memory stick - both Opera and Firefox allow this.
From the perspective of a library, it could be useful, but I think I might want them to appear as though they were part of my web pages, not something completely separate. I wasn't sure about the navigation aspect either - it struck me that Firefox could do some of what Delicious can do, and I don't think it would be impossible to write the bookmarking aspect of a browser to provide a list sorted by tags.
Finally I was a bit puzzled with this comment:
Compare this with saving your bookmarks via the browser menu command, where you can only access them from the computer you saved them on.)
If you were working on two separate PCs which didn't have roaming profiles, you could of course export your URLs and import them at the other PC - this isn't difficult with Firefox, but is a bit of a pain. Alternatively you could run the browser from a memory stick - both Opera and Firefox allow this.
Email addresses in Voyager
Check out this SlideShare Presentation:
Email addresses in Voyager
View more presentations from imburke11.
Slideshare; thing 11 - part 2
Hmm, now I've got my Powerpoint thing up, what do I think? Quite nice, though navigating the site isn't terribly intuitive. I also couldn't see how I could stop Slideshare from advertising similar presentations. It's quite nice, in some way, that it does, but I think it would be helpful to be able to turn that feature off.
Someone's bound to ask why? OK, let's say I advertise some particular process I would liek my users to carry out, but, I'd rather they didn't carry out some similar process. I can't stop them finding out about that second process, but I can at least not point them to it (and therefore avoid any responsibility). I can't think of a practical example right this minute though.
It's also worth pointing out that there are alternative ways of doing this. I've just taken the same presentation and turned it into html in one easy process. It's not very pretty, and does involve ActiveX it seems, but it did work. An alternative approach might be to download and install 'Cute PDF writer' which appears to your PC to be a printer, but produces PDFs. This can turn your Powerpoint presentation into a PDf which you could then put on a website.
P.S. The navigability issues seem to be a bit better once you've logged out and back in.
Someone's bound to ask why? OK, let's say I advertise some particular process I would liek my users to carry out, but, I'd rather they didn't carry out some similar process. I can't stop them finding out about that second process, but I can at least not point them to it (and therefore avoid any responsibility). I can't think of a practical example right this minute though.
It's also worth pointing out that there are alternative ways of doing this. I've just taken the same presentation and turned it into html in one easy process. It's not very pretty, and does involve ActiveX it seems, but it did work. An alternative approach might be to download and install 'Cute PDF writer' which appears to your PC to be a printer, but produces PDFs. This can turn your Powerpoint presentation into a PDf which you could then put on a website.
P.S. The navigability issues seem to be a bit better once you've logged out and back in.
Slideshare; thing11 - part 1
Oh dear, yet another login ID and password needed. At least I could recycle my Yahoo one with no problems.
At first sight this reminds me of the startup screen for IBM's PC operating system OS/2. It's difficult to know where to start, and even after a couple of minutes of looking I still can't see what I'm supposed to do first. Eventually I found a small quick tour link, which wasn't much help, and finally I saw the upload button. So far, so good.
So, I've uploaded a small Powerpoint presentation I've done, now I have to classify, oops, sorry, tag it. I'm not sure that the categories are particularly helpful - "Education" and "Technology" are a bit vague, so I thought I'd settle on "Humor", but had second thoughts as people may be expecting more jokes. At this point I'm trying to post this to Blogger, so I'll publish this bit now.
At first sight this reminds me of the startup screen for IBM's PC operating system OS/2. It's difficult to know where to start, and even after a couple of minutes of looking I still can't see what I'm supposed to do first. Eventually I found a small quick tour link, which wasn't much help, and finally I saw the upload button. So far, so good.
So, I've uploaded a small Powerpoint presentation I've done, now I have to classify, oops, sorry, tag it. I'm not sure that the categories are particularly helpful - "Education" and "Technology" are a bit vague, so I thought I'd settle on "Humor", but had second thoughts as people may be expecting more jokes. At this point I'm trying to post this to Blogger, so I'll publish this bit now.
Tuesday 17 August 2010
Flickr; thing 9, thing 10 and tagging
Flickr. I'd had a go at uploading some photos onto another photo sharing website, but hadn't done much with Flickr other than browsing around. Following the instructions I now have this photo:
This is quite a curious photo (taken by one Peer Gynt it would seem). It's of a British designed (specifically Vickers-Armstrong Ltd.) tank called the Valentine, at a museum in Russia. The Soviet Army was supplied with quite a large number of these, not that they were overly impressed with them, but rather than giving this example Soviet markings, they've had a not very successful go at a British marked vehicle (it's supposed to be in a unit of the 23rd Armoured Brigade, but I haven't managed to find the book which will tell me which unit is referred to by '67').
The original photo is at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/peer_gynt/3966916040/
(I've now found out more about the markings. It's supposed to be a Valentine of 'A' squadron, 50th Royal Tank Regiment - that's what the '67' means. There's even a photo of this vehicle in Tunisia in 'British tank markings and names by B.T. White'. The Liver Bird symbol to the right of the name really should be black on a white square and the 67 should, I think, be white on a black square, and the whole tank should be painted a sand colour, oh, and there should be a registration number, but apart that it's accurate.)
I've also set up my own Flickr account at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/53094833@N03/
So, is Flickr of any use? Quite handy if you want to get photos of obscure British military vehicles or aircraft. I'm not quite so sure about libraries though; after all, someone has to create the images in the first place and then feel sufficiently generous so as to make them freely available afterwards.
One worry might be that one library has a member of staff who's adept at creating such images, does them in work time, or using work resources, and makes them freely available, until there's a change in the economic climate, and management goes kerching! [2] and sees a potential income stream. What's the legal position if I make something freely available, then change my mind a year or two later? Am I entitled to start charging anyone who's used my images? Should people who who have used my images be checking the legal position regarding specific images regularly? One for a lawyer I think?
Another problem is the tagging issue. By allowing people to chose their own tags, you could get the same image described in different ways. For example, in my Flickr photostream, I've currently got pictures of half-a-dozen british military aircraft, carefully described with both their name and the manufacturer's name. Except, that is, for the Spitfire which I though was a sufficiently iconic name not to need Supermarine before it. After checking in Wikipedia I could see there was a car called a Triumph Spitfire, which might have been present at the event where I took the photo. Should I go back and make sure that the manufacturer is in the tag as well?
Not that there are problems only with user defined tags. Library of Congress subject headings are a well known subject classification scheme, but they're incomplete, wrong in some cases, and subject to needless changes (like 'World War, 1914-1918' to 'European War, 1914-1918' and then back again to 'World War, 1914-1918' a year later when people in Washington thought to look at some history books).
At this point I'm going to have to admit that I don't know what the answers are (and probably apologise for having possibly wasted some of your time reading this).
[1] This supposed to be the sound of a cash till. I could also have used the Tom and Jerry image of dollar signs in someone's eyes, but that would have been even more difficult to do - I doubt that there are any free to use images of that around.
This is quite a curious photo (taken by one Peer Gynt it would seem). It's of a British designed (specifically Vickers-Armstrong Ltd.) tank called the Valentine, at a museum in Russia. The Soviet Army was supplied with quite a large number of these, not that they were overly impressed with them, but rather than giving this example Soviet markings, they've had a not very successful go at a British marked vehicle (it's supposed to be in a unit of the 23rd Armoured Brigade, but I haven't managed to find the book which will tell me which unit is referred to by '67').The original photo is at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/peer_gynt/3966916040/
(I've now found out more about the markings. It's supposed to be a Valentine of 'A' squadron, 50th Royal Tank Regiment - that's what the '67' means. There's even a photo of this vehicle in Tunisia in 'British tank markings and names by B.T. White'. The Liver Bird symbol to the right of the name really should be black on a white square and the 67 should, I think, be white on a black square, and the whole tank should be painted a sand colour, oh, and there should be a registration number, but apart that it's accurate.)
I've also set up my own Flickr account at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/53094833@N03/
So, is Flickr of any use? Quite handy if you want to get photos of obscure British military vehicles or aircraft. I'm not quite so sure about libraries though; after all, someone has to create the images in the first place and then feel sufficiently generous so as to make them freely available afterwards.
One worry might be that one library has a member of staff who's adept at creating such images, does them in work time, or using work resources, and makes them freely available, until there's a change in the economic climate, and management goes kerching! [2] and sees a potential income stream. What's the legal position if I make something freely available, then change my mind a year or two later? Am I entitled to start charging anyone who's used my images? Should people who who have used my images be checking the legal position regarding specific images regularly? One for a lawyer I think?
Another problem is the tagging issue. By allowing people to chose their own tags, you could get the same image described in different ways. For example, in my Flickr photostream, I've currently got pictures of half-a-dozen british military aircraft, carefully described with both their name and the manufacturer's name. Except, that is, for the Spitfire which I though was a sufficiently iconic name not to need Supermarine before it. After checking in Wikipedia I could see there was a car called a Triumph Spitfire, which might have been present at the event where I took the photo. Should I go back and make sure that the manufacturer is in the tag as well?
Not that there are problems only with user defined tags. Library of Congress subject headings are a well known subject classification scheme, but they're incomplete, wrong in some cases, and subject to needless changes (like 'World War, 1914-1918' to 'European War, 1914-1918' and then back again to 'World War, 1914-1918' a year later when people in Washington thought to look at some history books).
At this point I'm going to have to admit that I don't know what the answers are (and probably apologise for having possibly wasted some of your time reading this).
[1] This supposed to be the sound of a cash till. I could also have used the Tom and Jerry image of dollar signs in someone's eyes, but that would have been even more difficult to do - I doubt that there are any free to use images of that around.
Friday 13 August 2010
A comment
It's been pointed out to me that I've had a comment. I think the commenter (or is that commentator?) may have missed my point (which isn't surprising since I didn't really explain it). Quite apart from the rather silly name, a lot of us have experience of twitter like activity. After all, even my mother sends text messages when she needs to.
The problem I see with twitter is the limit on characters - 140 isn't really enough for any serious communication. Recently I've had to send an email message to a fellow of Peterhouse explaining why the stack request system in the UL has to work the way it does; that couldn't be explained in less than 560 words, or more than 3000 characters, and a few weeks ago I sent a letter to Skoda commenting on their apparent inability to allow people to test drive cars that people might actually want to drive. It had to go as a letter because the comments form on their website had a limit of 1,000 characters.
Iain
The problem I see with twitter is the limit on characters - 140 isn't really enough for any serious communication. Recently I've had to send an email message to a fellow of Peterhouse explaining why the stack request system in the UL has to work the way it does; that couldn't be explained in less than 560 words, or more than 3000 characters, and a few weeks ago I sent a letter to Skoda commenting on their apparent inability to allow people to test drive cars that people might actually want to drive. It had to go as a letter because the comments form on their website had a limit of 1,000 characters.
Iain
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)